TDIH: Planning for D-Day
Did you know that planning for D-Day took more than a year?
On this day in 1943, FDR and Winston Churchill discuss the D-Day landings. That massive Allied invasion was still more than a year in the future, but planning was already underway.
Allied forces lacked the resources to undertake such a large offensive any sooner.
As the so-called TRIDENT Conference wrapped up in May 1943, the Allies were looking at a target date of May 1, 1944, for the Channel crossing and landings in France. But even that late date didn’t stick. In the end, the target date was moved to June 5. Bad weather would further delay the landings until June 6, 1944.
No one could then foresee these delays, of course. Perhaps it was for the best? Delays surely would have made Churchill pretty unhappy. A quick end to the war was important to him. He’d even taken a break from the conference with FDR and his military advisers during this week so long ago. Instead, he took the opportunity to address a joint session of Congress.
You may know that Churchill famously addressed Congress in December 1941, shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Now he was back again, speaking of his worry that critical support could be lost if the war were to continue for too long. The enemy would win, not because it was stronger, but only because resolve among the Allies had been undermined.
“We have surmounted many serious dangers,” he told Congress, “but there is one grave danger which will go along with us till the end; that danger is the undue prolongation of the war. . . . And it is in the dragging-out of the war at enormous expense, until the democracies are tired or bored or split, that the main hopes of Germany and Japan must now reside.”
Churchill concluded defiantly: “We must destroy this hope as we have destroyed so many others . . . . By singleness of purpose, by steadfastness of conduct, by tenacity and endurance such as we have so far displayed—by these, and only by these, can we discharge our duty to the future of the world and to the destiny of man.”
Churchill was always one to argue for perseverance, wasn’t he? But, then again, he was talking to a receptive audience. Perhaps he remembered that Americans have a long history of persevering and overcoming the odds?! Ironically, the British Prime Minister was reminding Americans of a trait that had enabled them to defeat the British during the American Revolution.
Churchill was exactly right, of course. Dogged perseverance has seen Americans through many tough times—and it can do so again today, if we let it.
Sources can always be found on my website, here.
My father was on an LST during the D Day invasion of France. Dogged perseverance was a trademark of the Greatest Generation and Churchill used that to build the cohesiveness among allies, mainly Britain and the United States needed to crush the Germans.
Yes, dogged perseverance is critical today for our country to survive the current crisis' we are facing. I am very afraid that we don't have the cohesiveness of purpose needed today. More now than ever, we need Divine Providence to help us through. In his name, I so pray.
Thank you Tara.
Perseverance was the character trait that has resulted in success for the US for generations. I pray that we have passed it on to the future generations. In God We Trust.