Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Al Cash's avatar

Well, I'll likely be the black sheep (if I can still say that) of this post. With my sincere and utmost respect, Pascal Poolaw had an incredible career in the Armed Forces and served his country with impeccable honor. Nonetheless, as a Vietnam War Era veteran, I have some reservations about him being eligible for the MOH - THE highest award for gallantry in the United States. From that perspective, Poolaw's actions fell well within the expectations of his men, his Army, and his fellow countrymen.

We lost over 58,000 service members during that war, many of which were under very similar battle conditions as those Poolaw experienced. These acts of gallantry are why the Silver Star award exists, and was indeed presented to Poolaw (posthumously) for this incident, as well as 265 other Vietnam War Silver Star recipients.

The fact that his ancestry is part and parcel to this story lends a bias to its value. We try, on a moral basis, to level the field across sex, race, religion, ethnicity and any number of other divisive attributes. But, at the same time, we tend to season most of our opinions with one of more of these defining characteristics. We cannot have our cake and eat it, too.

Remove the sentimental flavor of Poolaw's Native American heritage, and we're left with the likes of millions of military service members across many generations - all with remarkable patriotism, unquestionable loyalty, and bravery far exceeding those of ordinary men and women.

Save the Medal of Honor for the extreme acts of valor - those that exceed what is already expected of us as service members. Not all acts of bravery qualify for THE highest award, and, we don't get extra credit for being born into a certain sex, race, religion, or ethnicity.

Expand full comment
Frank Furno's avatar

Hmm. Tara, I did not get any impression from your words that you thought or were, in any way, putting forth an argument that Pascal Poolaw should be(perhaps?) reconsidered for the MOH merely because he was a “full-blooded Kiowa Indian”. The facts, as you succinctly laid out, included his history and his particular actions with respect to the events that occurred in Vietnam, October 7, 1967. Those events led to the MOH nomination that was not approved. It is not unnatural to have a review and reconsideration, which can be done,and certainly must be done, by an impartial review of the FACTS surrounding Pascal Poolaw’s acts of bravery, gallantry, sacrifice, valor, honor, and heroism. Great story, Tara!✌️

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts